W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header

From: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:21:46 +0200
To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1279207306.21884.2.camel@Nokia-N900>
Something along the lines of http proxies may act as gateways for non-http URIs such as ftp:// or gopher:// translating http operations on such URIs to appropriate actions in their respective protocol.  
----- Ursprungsmeddelande -----
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> > Is this (proxying other URI schemes through HTTP) worth making a
> > little more   explicit? The question of whether non-HTTP URI schemes
> > are allowed in HTTP   comes up from time to time. Other issues (e.g.,
> > what to do with the Host   header) come up as well.
> 
> As author of a tool that sends all sorts of URIs over HTTP proxies, I
> must say   that it would help to get the (lack of) documented support
> better detailed.
> 
> -- 
> 
>     / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2010 15:22:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:23 GMT