W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:46:51 +0200 (CEST)
To: Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007161943010.11526@tvnag.unkk.fr>
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Henrik Nordström wrote:

> Something along the lines of http proxies may act as gateways for non-http 
> URIs such as ftp:// or gopher:// translating http operations on such URIs to 
> appropriate actions in their respective protocol.

Yes. Ideally, it could also say something that proxies MAY deal with them and 
that if they decide to deal with them, they actually still speak HTTP even if 
the URL it passes on is another protocol.

In reality, it tends to mean that nothing but GET works, even if I've heard of 
HTTP proxies that actually support ftp upload using PUT!

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 17:47:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:23 GMT