W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Clarification on use of Content-Location header

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:52:38 +0200 (CEST)
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Henrik Nordström <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007141751370.23196@tvnag.unkk.fr>
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Is this (proxying other URI schemes through HTTP) worth making a little more 
> explicit? The question of whether non-HTTP URI schemes are allowed in HTTP 
> comes up from time to time. Other issues (e.g., what to do with the Host 
> header) come up as well.

As author of a tool that sends all sorts of URIs over HTTP proxies, I must say 
that it would help to get the (lack of) documented support better detailed.

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 15:53:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:23 GMT