> Now that we have the DAV:baseline-collection for a baseline, > I agree that this is a much more appropriate value for the > results of this report. In particular, I'd just return the > VCR URL from the DAV:baseline-collection (you could get the > version URL from the DAV:checked-in property, if you cared). > > Does anyone object? Of course not :-) However, now that I have a supporter I can at least try to be a bit more greedy ;-) For my anticipated use of this report, getting the version URLs as well would be a substantial gain over having to query the DAV:checked-in property for each change. Boris.Received on Friday, 9 February 2001 21:56:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:40 GMT