- From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 19:32:09 -0800
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 09:50:40PM -0500, Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI wrote: > > Now that we have the DAV:baseline-collection for a baseline, > > I agree that this is a much more appropriate value for the > > results of this report. In particular, I'd just return the > > VCR URL from the DAV:baseline-collection (you could get the > > version URL from the DAV:checked-in property, if you cared). > > > > Does anyone object? > > Of course not :-) > > However, now that I have a supporter I can at least try to be a bit more > greedy ;-) > > For my anticipated use of this report, getting the version URLs as well > would be a substantial gain over having to query the DAV:checked-in > property for each change. Agreed. Another alternative to making the DAV:checked-in special (or saying that the version resource URL is explicitly returned), is to simply allow a DAV:prop element to exist in the report request, and each set of properties will be returned for each [VCR] href mentioned in the report. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Friday, 9 February 2001 22:30:23 UTC