W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2001

VERSION-CONTROL status reporting

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:17:18 -0800
To: <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AMEPKEBLDJJCCDEJHAMIGENNCIAA.ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
In the 12.2 draft, Section 2.5 states:

> If the request-URL identifies a version-controlled resource,
> the resource just remains under version-control.  This allows
> a client to be unaware of whether or not a server automatically
> puts a resource under version control when it is created.

And then lists as a Postcondition:

> (DAV:already-under-version-control): If the request-URL identified
> a resource already under version control at the time of the request,
> the VERSION-CONTROL request MUST NOT change the DAV:checked-in or
> DAV:checked-out property of that version-controlled resource.

Section 1.6 then leads one to believe that this condition would result in a
403 or a 409 status response, even though this appears to be normal
operation, and hence would warrant a 200 OK response.

Geoff Clemm's message of February 4, 2001
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-dav-versioning/2001JanMar/0311.htm
l) makes it sound like this Postcondition would be dropped.  Is it
intentionally still in the draft?

- Jim
Received on Friday, 9 February 2001 01:18:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:40 GMT