W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: PROPFIND instead of REPORT

From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 02:36:19 -0800
To: Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI <Boris_Bokowski@oti.com>
Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <20001220023619.T7916@lyra.org>
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 01:25:22PM -0500, Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI wrote:
> > To be clear, I'm not against using REPORT.  I'm only for keeping the 
> CORE
> > requirements from having to support REPORT.  I don't think CORE needs
> > anything but PROPFIND for getting version info from the server.  I do 
> think
> > various advanced features are best served with REPORT.
> 
> Then what about putting version history resources into core versioning? In 
> document management systems, the history resource for a version like:
> http://dav.example.org/foo/document.htm?version=7
> could be just:
> http://dav.example.org/foo/document.htm

I'd expect the second URL to refer to the "latest" version rather than the
version history.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2000 05:32:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:39 GMT