- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:19:20 -0700
- To: "Amick, Eric" <Eric.Amick@mail.house.gov>
- Cc: "www-xsl-fo@w3.org" <www-xsl-fo@w3.org>, "xsl-editors@w3.org" <xsl-editors@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dUHBSBMg7fEq1Vb4H7JQKku=y81S-5ikqnSmVmMu35xw@mail.gmail.com>
No, I don't believe so: simple-page-master does not generate any area. It is page-sequence which generates the region viewport/reference pairs. On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Amick, Eric <Eric.Amick@mail.house.gov>wrote: > I may be misreading, but since a page-sequence is not a descendant of a > page-sequence, doesn’t the paragraph before the one you cited cover this > situation?**** > > ** ** > > The computed value of the designated property is taken from that property > on the layout formatting object being used to generate the region > viewport/reference area pair.**** > > ** ** > > In other words, the value comes from the simple-page-master called > all-pages.**** > > ** ** > > Eric Amick Systems Engineer II**** > > Legislative Computer Systems**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com] > *Sent:* Saturday, April 21, 2012 12:13 > *To:* www-xsl-fo@w3.org; xsl-editors@w3.org > *Subject:* 5.10.4 from-page-master-region discrepancy?**** > > ** ** > > In XSL-FO 1.1, 5.10.4, appears:**** > > ** ** > > "If this function is used in an expression on a formatting object, F, > that is a descendant of an fo:page-sequence, then the computed value is > taken from the region specification that was used to generate the nearest > ancestor region reference area which has as its descendants the areas > returned by F."**** > > ** ** > > However, this is followed by an example where "this function" > (from-page-master-region) is used on fo:page-sequence, and not a descendant > of fo:page-sequence!**** > > ** ** > > > <fo:page-sequence master-name="default-sequence"**** > > writing-mode="from-page-master-region()">**** > > ** ** > > How is this example to be reconciled with the normative language cited > above about being "used in an expression ... that is a descendant of an > fo:page-sequence"?**** > > ** ** > > Regards,**** > > Glenn**** > > ** ** >
Received on Monday, 30 April 2012 15:20:17 UTC