- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:34:22 -0500
- To: Holger Flörke <floerke@doctronic.de>, <xsl-editors@w3.org>
Regarding: > "When breaking a block by an included block, is the last line > before the included block affected by text-align-last?" the answer is yes. The correct handling should be: 1.) The last line before any embedded block/block-container should obey the text-align-last property. 2.) The first line in the outer block following the embedded block/block-container should obey text-align and should NOT have text-indent applied. This is covered in the XSL 1.1 spec by the wording at http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#text-align in the last paragraph of section 7.16.10 "text-align-last" which reads: Specifies the alignment of the last line-area child of the last block-area generated and returned by the formatting object, and to any line-area generated by the formatting object whose following sibling is a block-area that is not a line-area, and any lines in the block ending in U+000A. paul for the XSL FO SG > -----Original Message----- > From: xsl-editors-request@w3.org > [mailto:xsl-editors-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Holger Flörke > Sent: Tuesday, 2006 November 07 06:15 > To: xsl-editors@w3.org > Subject: Specification of "text-align-last" property > > > I noticed a different behaviour of the two main XSL-FO-Processors > RenderX XEP and AntennaHouse XSLFormatter with respect to the > "text-align-last" property of XSL-FO. Both support-teams say they are > right. Maybe I can get an "official" answer from the list. > > The problem can be summarizes as: "When breaking a block by > an included > block, is the last line before the included block affected by > text-align-last?" > > For Example: > > <fo:block text-align="justify" text-align-last="justify"> > brah brah<fo:block/>brah<fo:leader leader-pattern="dots"/> > </fo:block> > > will result in > """ > brah brah > brah.......... > """ > (notice the alignment of the first line) > > or in > > """ > brah brah > brah.......... > """ > > I am not really sure which one is conform to XSL-FO 1.1. Maybe someone > can help. > > Best Regards, > > Holger > -- > holger floerke d o c t r o n i c > email floerke@doctronic.de information publishing + retrieval > phone +49 228 92 682 00 http://www.doctronic.de > > >
Received on Monday, 13 November 2006 15:36:08 UTC