- From: Peter B. West <pbwest@powerup.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:14:32 +1000
- To: xsl-editors <xsl-editors@w3.org>
Resending due to mail problems. My apologies for any multiple occurrences. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: page-viewport-area content-rectangle Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:31:14 +1000 From: Peter B. West <pbwest@tpg.com.au> To: xsl-editors <xsl-editors@w3.org> CC: fop-dev <fop-dev@xml.apache.org> The editors, The nub of my question is, "Why do the page margins establish a distance between the content rectangle of the page-viewport-area and the page-reference-area, when for other viewport/reference pairs, they establish a distance between both the viewport and reference content rectangle and some enclosing reference area, at least for some dimension?" For example, in "6.4.12 fo:simple-page-master", "Constraints applicable to regions", it is stated that "If the flow assigned to the corresponding region is an fo:flow formatting object, then * If the value of the media-usage trait is paginate, or the value of the overflow trait is visible, hidden, or error-if-overflow, then the block-progression-dimension of the region-reference-area is constrained to be no greater than the block-progression-dimension of the region-viewport-area." An number of conditions concerning media-usage and the block-progression dimension of the region-reference-area are stated, but, it seems to me, the margins which were specified on the region-master play no part in the development of that dimension, apart from providing a common starting point for both the region-viewport-area and the region-reference-area. This is seen in the definitions for region-body, where the margins (defined on the region-master for the region-body, with respect to the content-rectangle of the page-reference-area) are to accommodate the four boundary regions. http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice6.html#fo_simple-page-master Region-viewport-areas diagram, and in the 'Margins of a page' (MediaReferenceArea.html) and 'Two page model examples' (PageAndRegion-bodyWithOrientationOnPage.html) diagrams, and in http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice6.html#fo_region-body in the diagram 'A close-up of the first case in the previous figure' (PageAndRegion-bodyMargins.html). Is there an inconsistency between the page-level viewport/reference pair ans other viewport/reference pairs, notably the region-body pair? If so, is it intentional? To what purpose? Peter -- Peter B. West <http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html>
Received on Friday, 20 February 2004 20:14:30 UTC