- From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:25:55 +0100
- To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
- Cc: xsl-editors@w3.org
Eliot wrote: > Different FO implementations behave differently, but in > general, unless > you provide break points using either zero-width spaces or > soft hyphens, > the renderer will not break the text for you because it really isn't > licensed to do so, except possibly as an overflow fallback. > > It would probably be useful for XSL FO implementations to > provide some > way to configure their behavior in these sorts of situations, but > anything like that would be outside the scope of what the FO > spec defines. Since it is requested so often, perhaps asking the WG to consider a solution is appropriate? The most often requested place is a table cell, so perhaps something like a hint to the processor, break-at="20" meaning if needed, presume a soft-hyphen at character position 20 within any word? Any other suggestions anyone? regards DaveP - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 03:27:13 UTC