- From: Anders Berglund <alrb@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 12:01:17 -0500
- To: "Glenn Adams" <gadams@vgi.com>
- Cc: "XSL Editors" <xsl-editors@w3.org>
For the CR a new common property group (containing relative-position, top, bottom, left, right) has been added and this group is referenced rather than the "relative-position" property. Relative position is a RENDERING only effect and thus the formatting (including any border collapsing) is done as if there was NO relative positioning. Anders "Glenn Adams" <gadams@vgi.com>@w3.org on 11/04/2000 06:25:00 PM Sent by: xsl-editors-request@w3.org To: "XSL Editors" <xsl-editors@w3.org> cc: Subject: relative-position property and fo:table* The relative-position property is permitted on: fo:table-and-caption fo:table fo:table-caption fo:table-header fo:table-footer fo:table-body fo:table-row fo:table-cell However, the position properties (right, left, top, bottom) are not listed as applicable to the above FOs under the definition of these FOs. If the value of relative-position is "relative", then these position properties would be required to specify the relative offset. Now, to come to a more interesting problem, how would the use of relative-offset with a value of "relative" on the following FOs impact the border collapse behavior: fo:table-header fo:table-footer fo:table-body fo:table-row fo:table-cell Would the use of relative positioning on any of these FOs disqualify it for participation in border collapsing? Regards, Glenn
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2000 12:01:33 UTC