- From: Erik Siegel <erik@xatapult.nl>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 15:04:03 +0100
- To: xproc-dev@w3.org
Hello XProc friends, Here are my thoughts on this: Given point 7 in Norm's long post: Yes that's too weird. So let's change the spec. I don't know whether many pipelines will be affected, but I suspect not a lot. (In retrospect I'm mighty glad I always use xs:string for handling URIs, so whatever happens with them is up to my implementation...) And yes, we should definitely change p:namespace-rename. Regards, Erik Siegel PS: If we're going to publish 3.2, I hope we can resolve https://github.com/xproc/3.0-steps/issues/691 also. On 06/01/2026 13:42, Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote: > Now that we’re (mostly) in the post-holiday season, I’d really like to get feedback on this: > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xproc-dev/2025Dec/0018.html > > (It was probably silly of me to send it during the holiday season, but that’s when I was thinking about it.) > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norm Tovey-Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> > https://norm.tovey-walsh.com/ > >> For the skeptic there remains only one consolation: if there should be >> such a thing as superhuman law it is administered with subhuman >> inefficiency.--Eric Ambler >
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2026 14:04:13 UTC