Re: [XProc 3 port@pipeline] Usage of such a shortcut

Christophe Marchand <> writes:
> Or, if I can't, is there an XSPec XPath extension function that
> returns the content of port@named-pipe ?

No. That would move computation of pipeline connections out of the
static analysis phase and into the runtime. That’s out-of-scope for
XProc 3.0. You can still achieve what you for ordinary options by using
the “long form” of p:with-option. Maybe that’s not possible for the
message feature. Hmmm. Not in 3.0!

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Tovey-Walsh
Principal Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676

Received on Tuesday, 5 May 2020 18:22:51 UTC