Re: p:with-input and compound steps

Jostein Austvik Jacobsen <josteinaj@gmail.com> writes:
> 2./5.: If it's important to be aligned with XProc 1.0, then
> "current" would be the primary input port in a p:for-each. But I
> guess that's a bit awkward when used in a p:with-input.

The port named “current” is still what the steps *inside* the loop
read from. This question is about how input is connected to the
for-each loop itself!

> Could also work for options if option names were NCNames instead of
> QNames (are QNames really used for option names anyway?): <with:href
> select="..."/>

I don’t think we want to walk on the namespaces available for options.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com