Re: Also speaking of @select

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:01:28AM +0200, Ari Nordström wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Fair enough--and I just learned something new--but the same question would
> have to be applied to every non-XML content type you might want to address
> through @select. Or would the spec say 'XPath for XML content,
> implementation-specific for any other'? Or just say 'anything goes' for any
> content type?
> 
> Or did I get this wrong?

You're right, it would mainly be an extension point (and possibly 
the can of worms that is mentioned in other emails in this thread).

Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2017 08:53:37 UTC