- From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@wendellpiez.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 17:34:06 -0400
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Hi Norm, On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Wendell Piez <wapiez@wendellpiez.com> writes: >> (Of course, this would be p:serialization ... what would be the XProc >> way to bind it to c:entry ...?) > > Well, p:serialization isn’t (currently) designed to be named and > reused. Oh is that why I have one for almost every output port? :-) > For the p:zip step, I think we’d just extend the content model > of c:entry to allow the serialization options. > > But at that point, you’d probably really want a mechanism to name and > reuse them… Even without, having them settable at all would be a big advance ... at least, towards supporting last-century systems that expect to see FPIs on all their contents (for no good discernible reason I can see). So thanks, I'm looking at that github thing. (Calabash/XProc <= awesome btw.) Cheers, Wendell > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The Future is something which everyone > http://nwalsh.com/ | reaches at the rate of sixty minutes an > | hour, whatever he does, whoever he > | is.--C. S. Lewis -- Wendell Piez | http://www.wendellpiez.com XML | XSLT | electronic publishing Eat Your Vegetables _____oo_________o_o___ooooo____ooooooo_^
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 21:34:35 UTC