Re: Doctype declarations on XML produced in zips

Wendell Piez <wapiez@wendellpiez.com> writes:
> (Of course, this would be p:serialization ... what would be the XProc
> way to bind it to c:entry ...?)

Well, p:serialization isn’t (currently) designed to be named and
reused. For the p:zip step, I think we’d just extend the content model
of c:entry to allow the serialization options.

But at that point, you’d probably really want a mechanism to name and
reuse them…

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The Future is something which everyone
http://nwalsh.com/            | reaches at the rate of sixty minutes an
                              | hour, whatever he does, whoever he
                              | is.--C. S. Lewis