Re: Java 1.7?

• From: Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex <gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de>
• Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:18:54 +0100
• To: xproc-dev@w3.org
• Message-ID: <54E3860E.5050909@le-tex.de>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


On 17.02.2015 18:40, Norman Walsh wrote:
> 
> Yeah, that's an idea. I wonder if it would be acceptable to have
> Saxon 9.5/Java 1.6 and Saxon 9.6/Java 1.7? If I treat them as
> orthogonal, I wind up with four builds.

That’d be ok with us (we are currently using the 1.6/9.5 combo).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=RY9z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2015 18:19:24 UTC