There's no dedicated place for a general discussion, but you can create issues on the issue tracker for specific questions or issues: https://github.com/daisy-consortium/xprocspec/issues Feel free to create a new thread on xproc-dev. re: context scope: yes, I considered wrapping the context declaration and assertions in groups, but that would make it even more verbose. Assertions (x:expect) currently always refer to their first preceding context declaration (x:context). Jostein On 21 February 2014 14:36, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> wrote: > On 21 February 2014 13:24, Jostein Austvik Jacobsen wrote: > > > I think it is useful to be able to define a context, rather than > referring > > directly to output ports etc. from the assertion element. You often want > to > > perform multiple assertions against the same context > > True. In that case, it would probably make more sense to say: > > <x:context ...> > <x:assert-1 .../> > <x:assert-2 .../> > </x:context> > > so that the context scope is well defined. This thread becomes really > XProcSpec-oriented. Is there a dedicated place to discuss it, or > should we start a new thread on XProc Dev? > > Regards, > > -- > Florent Georges > http://fgeorges.org/ > http://h2oconsulting.be/ >
Received on Friday, 21 February 2014 13:45:26 UTC