- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:36:21 +0000
- To: Jostein Austvik Jacobsen <josteinaj@gmail.com>
- Cc: Romain Deltour <rdeltour@gmail.com>, "Geert J." <geert.josten@dayon.nl>, XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
On 21 February 2014 13:24, Jostein Austvik Jacobsen wrote:
> I think it is useful to be able to define a context, rather than referring
> directly to output ports etc. from the assertion element. You often want to
> perform multiple assertions against the same context
True. In that case, it would probably make more sense to say:
<x:context ...>
<x:assert-1 .../>
<x:assert-2 .../>
</x:context>
so that the context scope is well defined. This thread becomes really
XProcSpec-oriented. Is there a dedicated place to discuss it, or
should we start a new thread on XProc Dev?
Regards,
--
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
http://h2oconsulting.be/
Received on Friday, 21 February 2014 13:37:09 UTC