- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 12:43:24 +0100
- To: "xproc-dev@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADsXk-Y6Ep6uG35fZ3ZQ0F=yq0am5sLGSPVS-=1JkoP1NbV9HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you to everyone who attended ... the survey of opinion was lightweight, but a useful quick sample ... to summarise; Is XProc v2 requirements doc on the right track ? * IMHO, not enough ppl have read the requirements doc to begin answering the question reasonably * propose that folks take another look at http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc-v2-req/ How XProc is being used * most ppl using XProc to replace 'duct tape' solutions. * many using it as basis for publishing Which user is most important in XProc solution * the developer implementing the solution was by far the most important user in the toolchain currently XProc * Parameters still a burning topic, looks unlikely that we could drop for v2 Use Cases * JF to sit with Romain Deltour * JF to sit with Gerrit Imsieke Was suggested that DITA / XProc should be promoted * Jim Fuller will setup XProc meetup at DITA Europe (maybe George from oXygenXML can provide some advice) * XProc submissions for DITA orientated conferences * expect another mail to the list on this one following up Over XML Prague (and as ever via mailing list) Please feel free to approach any of us on the Working Group * Norm Walsh * Alex Milowski * Mohamed Zergaoui * Jim Fuller And give us your opinions, criticisms and what is important to you for XProc v2. thx, Jim Fuller
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 11:43:56 UTC