Re: No more parameter ports

Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes:
>   I mostly agree. But still I like to be able to pass parameters
> around as a first-class object, where the set of parameters (including
> their names and the number of them) is generated in a previous step,
> and passed to a step that will actually use them in calling the step
> consuming them.

Yeah. It's not clear to me if that can be supported without having a
feature of roughly the same complexity as we have today.

>   Maybe there could be a parameter set concept that would be decoupled
> from ports?

Maybe.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com