Re: No more parameter ports

David Cramer <david@thingbag.net> writes:
> Would you have to specifiy every parameter in the pipeline that could
> be passed in to the step? Would you also have to specify a defaut
> value for it? Thinking of the DocBook xslts, which have many params
> with sensible defaults set, you don't want to HAVE to repeat the full
> list of allowed params and their defaults in the xpl. I suppose you
> could generate part of your pipeline from your xslts, but that's just
> moving the work and complexity to another place.

If we do nothing else, then yes, it means you'd have to name them all.
I think we might be able to manage a little something, but the heart
of the proposal is "drop this feature on the floor".

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com