Re: Calabash 1.1?

  I see.  I thought it was in a better shape than this.  I am glad to
go on with Calabash 1 then, waiting for 2.0 to be stabilized.  Thanks
anyway!

-- 
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
http://h2oconsulting.be/


On 27 November 2013 01:25, Norman Walsh wrote:
> Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes:
>>   Sounds great!  Is it anywhere on GitHub or somewhere else?  I am trying to sort out
>> integration of Calabash with the latest version of Servlex.  Instead of spending any time on
>> 1.0 or 1.1, I'd rather spend time on 2.0-pre then, even if it is not stable yet, if it is
>> possible.
>
> I'll open it up as soon as I can. It is utterly incapable of anything
> at the moment, and I'm still refactoring it pretty frequently. It's on
> pieces on the floor at the moment, but I'll check it in once I get it
> back to the point where it (simulates) running a simple pipeline.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh
> Lead Engineer
> MarkLogic Corporation
> Phone: +1 512 761 6676
> www.marklogic.com

Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2013 19:31:20 UTC