Re: own defined step and xml:base "inheritance"

Hi Florent, hope you're fine since XML Prague 2012 :)

Thanks for your reply and the links. I didn't really know the function
static-base-uri() actually, might be usefull !

Unfortunately I didn't managed to make it works with xproc/calabash :

<p:import href="common.xpl"/>
<igs:xslt href="xsl/igs/v2.5/main_igs_v2.5.xsl" xml:base="
http://localhost:777/">
    <p:with-option name="static-base-uri" select="static-base-uri()"
xml:base="toto"/>
       ...
</igs:xslt>

common.xpl
<p:declare-step type="igs:xslt" name="current">
       ...
    <p:option name="static-base-uri" select="static-base-uri()"/>
     <cx:message>
        <p:with-option name="message" select="concat('static-base-uri() :
',static-base-uri())"/>
    </cx:message>
    <cx:message>
        <p:with-option name="message" select="concat('$static-base-uri :
',$static-base-uri)"/>
    </cx:message>
       ...
</p:declare-step>

I get theses messages :
static-base-uri() :
$static-base-uri :

Seems like static-base-uri() is always empty, equal where I call it from.
Calabash ?

By the way, if my last post interpretation of the problem is correct, then
I have to use <p:inline> or <p:document> so my xml:base attribute are
interpreted.

Unless I missed something, I continue to see how it works.

Au plaisir de te revoir et de discuter le coup !

Matthieu.


2013/12/16 Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>

> On 16 December 2013 11:27, RICAUD-DUSSARGET Matthieu wrote:
>
>   Hi,
>
> > - base-uri()
> > - base-uri(.)
> > - base-uri(/*)
>
> > It always refers to the base-uri of the *XML file being processed* (by
> > default the folder where the xml file is stored), not the Xproc Pipeline
> > neither the xml:base attribute I've add to the XPL file.
>
>   It looks like what you are looking for is static-base-uri(.).  On a
> side note, URI resolution is not rocket science, but still it requires
> precision.  You must know how URIs are resolved, and where they come
> from.  That's a bit of investment, but then it makes you save time,
> instead of the "trying / failing" scheme.  Some interesting readings:
>
>     http://w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#func-base-uri
>     http://w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#func-static-base-uri
>     http://w3.org/TR/xpath-functions/#func-resolve-uri
>
>   What I do, usually, is always to pass either absolute URIs, or
> always pass the base URI they should be resolved against when they are
> relative.
>
>   Regards,
>
> --
> Florent Georges
> http://fgeorges.org/
> http://h2oconsulting.be/
>



-- 
Matthieu Ricaud-Dussarget
IGS-CP - Développeur XML
05 45 37 09 49