- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:59:32 +0100
- To: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
On 12 September 2012 15:29, Innovimax SARL wrote: Hi, > This base64 text > [...] > Into this HTML string > [...] > and then many XProc implementation agree on converting this to > [...] > HTML LIVE DOM says that it must be > [...] > Which would make Calabash be the only to answer correctly > How do we deal with this > 1) We say Calabash is right and fix the test > 2) We keep saying Calabash is wrong > 3) We say Both are right and add a way to put it into the testsuite I am not sure to understand what the problem is. If I am right, the base 64 part is not relevant, this is only about how the decoded, ill-formed HTML markup is parsed into an XML document, right? Between the excerpt you've shown an the one on Live DOM, the only difference I can spot is the extra whitespace-only text node in EM around B. Is there anything else? Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2012 17:00:29 UTC