- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 10:26:39 +0100
- To: Chris Selwyn <chris@selwyn-family.me.uk>
- Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Chris Selwyn <chris@selwyn-family.me.uk> wrote: > And the one after that... what will it be called? > > "XProc: An XML Pipeline Language Version V.theoneafternext" > or (confusingly) > "XProc: An XML Pipeline Language Version V.next" > > ? Its an important point that Chris brings up .. clearly v.next or v.theoneafternext is not sustainable I think its probably best just to wait until whatever WHAT WG does with their spec and we slavishly emulate. J
Received on Sunday, 4 November 2012 09:27:06 UTC