Re: WG working on xproc requirements/use cases v2

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
<gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de> wrote:
> Speaking of centuries and numbers: shouldn’t we rename the century that we
> live in to “current century” instead of 21st? Or would you prefer “living
> century”?

I Think it would be best to give the current century an opaque and
unique identifier e.g.

09hag0fcw2ehd208hf2r13412312093j9u23712

is probably much better then current or even 21st century

J

>
>
> On 2012-11-02 12:40, Jirka Kosek wrote:
>>
>> On 2.11.2012 12:23, Norman Walsh wrote:
>>>
>>> Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl> writes:
>>>
>>>> Shouldn't we name this XProc v3?
>>>
>>>
>>> Numbers are so last century. We're going to switch to meaningful
>>> names. The official name for the next release of XProc is going to be
>>> "XProc: An XML Pipeline Language Version V.next".
>>
>>
>> Hmm, probably I'm too late to party, but what about:
>>
>> XProc: Living XML Pipeline
>>
>>                                 Jirka
>>
>
> --
> Gerrit Imsieke
> Geschäftsführer / Managing Director
> le-tex publishing services GmbH
> Weissenfelser Str. 84, 04229 Leipzig, Germany
> Phone +49 341 355356 110, Fax +49 341 355356 510
> gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de, http://www.le-tex.de
>
> Registergericht / Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Leipzig
> Registernummer / Registration Number: HRB 24930
>
> Geschäftsführer: Gerrit Imsieke, Svea Jelonek,
> Thomas Schmidt, Dr. Reinhard Vöckler
>

Received on Sunday, 4 November 2012 09:24:55 UTC