W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > June 2012

Re: result-document -- why does XProc care?

From: alyx <alyxtmp-netbeans@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1340815899.87941.YahooMailRC@web181019.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
To: xproc-dev@w3.org
Cc: Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl>
Indeed i was, suspected i was missing something important about the process, 

----- Original Message ----
From: Geert Josten <geert.josten@dayon.nl>
To: alyx <alyxtmp-netbeans@yahoo.com>; xproc-dev@w3.org
Sent: Tue, June 26, 2012 12:46:39 PM
Subject: RE: result-document -- why does XProc care?

Hi Alex,

I think you are overlooking the fact that anything produced with
xsl:result-document doesn't get written to disk directly within XProc, but
is added to the secondary output sequence.

The current version of XProc doesn't account for non-XML data, but
XMLCalabash can cope with it reasonably well. Also, there is work in
progress to extend XProc in this area. Vojtech gave a nice presentation on
that topic at this year's XMLPrague conference:

Kind regards,
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2012 16:52:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:17:03 UTC