- From: Tom Hillman <yamahito@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 03:44:35 +0100
- To: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Cc: "HILLMAN, Tomos" <tomos.hillman@oup.com>, "xproc-dev@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 6 September 2010 02:43:59 UTC
Thanks, but I really meant within a step. Out of interest, what would you say the advantage is of an xproc wrapper around a single xslt step? Reusability? Tom On 5 Sep 2010, at 19:06, mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 2:00 PM, HILLMAN, Tomos <tomos.hillman@oup.com> wrote: > On that note, does anyone have any principles or rules of thumb as to when it's best to use xproc and when it's best to do something using xslt? > > I would say always use XProc > > Even if you end up having only one XSLT step in the pipeline, it's already worth > > Xmlizer
Received on Monday, 6 September 2010 02:43:59 UTC