- From: Philip Fennell <Philip.Fennell@marklogic.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 13:33:47 -0700
- To: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>, "HILLMAN, Tomos" <tomos.hillman@oup.com>
- CC: "xproc-dev@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Tomos wrote: > On that note, does anyone have any principles or rules of thumb as > to when it's best to use xproc and when it's best to do something > using xslt? In my experience, if the XProc 'transformation' you are attempting starts to feel too complicated then you've already crossed the line and you should consider taking a few steps back (no pun intended) and whip-up a quick bit of XSLT that would more concisely achieve what you're after. Regards Philip From: xproc-dev-request@w3.org [mailto:xproc-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of mozer Sent: 05 September, 2010 7:07 PM To: HILLMAN, Tomos Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org Subject: Re: Can a pipeline 'call' itself? On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 2:00 PM, HILLMAN, Tomos <tomos.hillman@oup.com> wrote: On that note, does anyone have any principles or rules of thumb as to when it's best to use xproc and when it's best to do something using xslt? I would say always use XProc Even if you end up having only one XSLT step in the pipeline, it's already worth Xmlizer
Received on Sunday, 5 September 2010 20:34:19 UTC