W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > September 2010

Re: [xproc-dev] <none>

From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 19:44:02 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimMagHUwnHOAk0LPBKq_icn-n-dPf2i8yjOuOUT@mail.gmail.com>
To: temp44@szm.sk
Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
So you're comparing

It is a static error if a pipeline contains a step whose specified inputs,
outputs, and options do not match the signature for steps of that type.

See: Extension Steps <http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/#err.inline.S0010>

It is a static error to use an option on an atomic step that is not declared
on steps of that type.

See: Syntactic Shortcut for Option
, p:with-option <http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/#err.inline.S0031.1>
We can indeed say that XS0010 is more general than XS0031

Hope this helps

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:54 PM, temp <temp44@szm.sk> wrote:

> Hello,
> I would like to ask, what exactly is the difference between XS0010 and
> XS0031? I mean, isn't XS0031 a subset of XS0010?
> Thanks
> === reklama ======================================
> http://mail.szm.com - e-mail a priestor na www stranku zadarmo
> http://webhosting.szm.com - domény a webhosting za najnižšie ceny
> SZM.com používa COMDOM Antispam - www.comdomsoft.com<http://www.comdomsoft.com>
Received on Sunday, 5 September 2010 17:44:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:16:54 UTC