- From: Will McCutchen <mccutchen@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:51:15 -0500
- To: Philip Fennell <Philip.Fennell@marklogic.com>
- Cc: "xproc-dev@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Philip, On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Philip Fennell <Philip.Fennell@marklogic.com> wrote: > If you are desperate to simplify this then you can declare your own > pipeline step that encapsulates the p:xslt step. If all it is that > changes is the URL of the XSLT document then make that the single > option in your step. The down side to this is that because you > cannot parameterise the href attribute on the p:document instruction > you will need to use a p:load in your step in order to bring the > referenced transform into the pipeline. You'd end up with a sequence > of one line steps in you pipeline plus a reference to the library > module that your step declaration exists in. Would you mind elaborating on that? I've been unable to figure out how to put it together myself... I'm a little overwhelmed by XProc, at the moment. The solution you describe sounds like the exact solution I was hoping would be possible. A sequence of one line steps would be ideal for my use case. > That'd 'simplify' the appearance of the pipeline but obfuscate > what's going. I think I'm fine with that tradeoff. This simplification is for the benefit of some end users who are a little uncomfortable making changes to these unfamiliar XML files. Thanks so much, - Hide quoted text - Will McCutchen. mccutchen@gmail.com
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 15:51:50 UTC