- From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:32:44 +0200
- To: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Cc: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com, xproc-dev@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 15:33:19 UTC
To really reflect that it's not a p:hash like the other but a combination of hash and mac (hence the +), I know the name is with a dash, but it is clearly used in a context where people are talking about hmac and not bout hash functions only But, nevermind, as I said, "-" will be fine Regards, Xmlizer On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>wrote: > On 19 May 2010 11:47, mozer wrote: > > Hi, > > > I proposed "_" because "+" is not available > > Sounds weird to me. Why would you have liked "+"? The usual name > is HMAC-SHA, isn't it? > > Regards, > > -- > Florent Georges > http://fgeorges.org/ >
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 15:33:19 UTC