RE: EXProc proposal: pxp:hmac-sha1 (and pxp:hmac-md5)

> > I would probably better go for a p:hash extension for the moment but
not the
> > way it is proposed
> > * @algorithm=pxp:hmac_sha @version=1
> > * @param(key)= key
> > (see the pxp:hmac_sha instead of only pxp:hmac)
>   Yes, I was also wondering why we had hmac here instead of hmac-sha.
> For what is worth, I would rather say pxp:hmac-sha, with an hyphen
> instead of an underscore.  That's consistent with the existing QName,
> and with the actual name of HMAC-SHA.

Looks good. I also prefer pxp:hmac-sha instead of using the underscore.


Vojtech Toman
Principal Software Engineer
EMC Corporation

Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 09:10:55 UTC