- From: George Cristian Bina <george@oxygenxml.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:49:11 +0200
- To: Adam Constabaris <adamc@unc.edu>
- CC: xproc-dev@w3.org
The use-when attribute from the http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc namespace is declared also by the extension.attr pattern referred from common.attr. You can exclude the http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc namespace from that by replacing the extension.attr definition with something like below: <define name="extension.attr"> <attribute> <anyName> <except> <nsName ns=""/> <nsName ns="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc"/> <nsName ns="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace"/> </except> </anyName> </attribute> </define> Best Regards, George -- George Cristian Bina <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger http://www.oxygenxml.com On 2/5/10 9:07 PM, Adam Constabaris wrote: > Hello, > > In trying to resolve a XS0044 "Unexpected step name" error under > Calabash (0.9.15), I attempted to validate my pipeline document using > the RNC schema at > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/schemas/xproc.rnc > > Jing (2009-11-11 version, but a previous version yielded the same > result) issues the following complaint: > ===================== > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/schemas/xproc.rnc:590:4: error: duplicate > attribute "use-when" from namespace "http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc" > > (command: java -jar jing.jar -c > http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/schemas/xproc.rnc pipeline.xpl) > > =================== > > Assuming this could be an issue that cropped up after translating from > RNG to RNC, I tried jing again with the RNG: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/schemas/xproc.rng:1154:14: error: duplicate > attribute "use-when" from namespace "http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc" > > (java -jar jing-20091111/bin/jing.jar > http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/schemas/xproc.rng pipeline.xpl) > > Similar results occured against the RNG with libxml2's xmllint (version > 20705) > > Either one on its own could be chalked up to bugs in the validation > tools, but th makes me suspect there may be an issue with the schemas. A > spot check of the .rnc didn't reveal any obvious definition of use-when. > > Does anybody have validation working against these documents? > > cheers, > > AC > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 8 February 2010 12:49:43 UTC