[closed] Re: Current XProc schema documents valid?

Adam Constabaris <adamc@unc.edu> writes:

> Either one on its own could be chalked up to bugs in the validation
> tools, but th makes me suspect there may be an issue with the schemas. A
> spot check of the .rnc didn't reveal any obvious definition of use-when.

Yep. My bad.

I would have sworn the spec build validated the examples, and by
extension the schema, but I guess I'd have been wrong.

> Does anybody have validation working against these documents?

Fixed.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Men are more like the times they live
http://nwalsh.com/            | in than they are like their
                              | fathers.--Ali Ibn-abi-talib