- From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:51:00 -0700
- To: rjelliffe@allette.com.au
- Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org, XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6fa681b10909191951v221b11cerb0b8e9e9ae444383@mail.gmail.com>
I'm going to ask what may be an obvious question, but wouldn't it make sense for a serialization of a sequence to correspond on the output to the serialization on the input? That is to say, if you had a structure: ("foo",5,<bar><bat/></bar>,<!-- foo -->) internally, wouldn't that also be the serialization format? Admittedly, there's a little more complexity in dealing with fragments and the like, but at least with the sequence case, the delimiters would presumably be those used for XQuery on input. Kurt Cagle Managing Editor http://xmlToday.org On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 5:05 PM, <rjelliffe@allette.com.au> wrote: > Probably someone has mentioned this, but one approach might be based on > Michael's attributes: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/04/xmlschema-psvi-in-xml > > I also think there is merit in something like the following: > > <xdm:typed-document> > <xdm:type> > <rdf:bag> > <xs:string/> > <xs:unsignedShort length="4" /> > </rdf:bag> > </xdm:type> > <xdm:data> > <address> > <city>Sydney</city> > <postcode>2009</city> > </address> > </xdm:data> > </xdm:typed-document> > > Where the original document can be reconstructed merely by taking the > /*/*[2]/* branch, and there is one element in the type branch for every > element in the data branch. > > Cheers > Rick Jelliffe > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS > to support XML implementation and development. To minimize > spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. > > [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ > Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.xml.org > subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@lists.xml.org > List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php > >
Received on Sunday, 20 September 2009 02:51:40 UTC