- From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 19:18:27 -0700
- To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- Cc: "xproc-dev@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <6fa681b10905091918m2cb680faj7d4c7986066efa01@mail.gmail.com>
This might also be a little controversial, but what about human workflow steps? Something like a <p:wait/> or <p:user-input/> step that will hold the processor in a holding pattern until some kind of response is received. I could see this especially in a setup that generates an XForms for input. Kurt Cagle Managing Editor http://xmlToday.org On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org>wrote: > > Hi Leif, > > > I've been working on an XProc GUI using WireIt [1]. > > Great! I'm eager to see it when you have it ready. > > > Is the configuration management tool similiar > > to a version control system > > (i.e. git, svn, etc)? > > Yes, that's what I was thinking. > > > I was thinking it would be nice to have a central directory of XProc > > libraries that encapsulate web service APIs. Yahoo recently put a > > user-contributable directory of web service wrappers up on github for use > > from YQL [2]. They specify the URL and input parameters (required or > > optional), but don't seem to say much about the output of the web > services > > (arguably much more complicated). > > > Maybe say, I'd want a bus arrival step (that encapsulates my transit > service > > api), and later on some info from that could go into a mapping step... > > Great idea! > > /Roger > > > [1] http://javascript.neyric.com/wireit/ > > [2] > > http://www.javarants.com/2009/02/05/yql-opens-up-3rd-party-web-service-table-definitions-to-developers/ > > > -Leif Warner >
Received on Sunday, 10 May 2009 02:19:13 UTC