- From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:19:19 +0200
- To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- Cc: "xproc-dev@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:16 PM, mozer<xmlizer@gmail.com> wrote: > No the fact that you CAN do it does inforce you to do it No the fact that you CAN do it, DOESN'T inforce you to do it (sorry for the confusion) > > In XML for text content, > > you MUST escape "<" with < > you MUST escape "&" with & > but > you MAY escape ">" with > > you MAY escape "\"" with " > you MAY escape "'" with ' > > So Calabash is ok and the Spec is ok too > > Xmlizer > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Costello, Roger L.<costello@mitre.org> wrote: >> >>> There's no need to escape > in XML >> >> Calabash does escape the > symbol. So is Calabash erroneous? >> >> /Roger >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: mozer [mailto:xmlizer@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 3:05 PM >>> To: Costello, Roger L. >>> Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org >>> Subject: Re: Typo in the prose for p:escape-markup >>> >>> Roger, >>> >>> There's no need to escape > in XML >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Xmlizer >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Costello, Roger >>> L.<costello@mitre.org> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hey Norm, >>> > >>> > The spec gives this example: >>> > >>> > The input: >>> > >>> > <description> >>> > <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> >>> > <p>This is a chunk of XHTML.</p> >>> > </div> >>> > </description> >>> > >>> > produces: >>> > >>> > <description> >>> > <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> >>> > <p>This is a chunk of XHTML.</p> >>> > </div> >>> > </description> >>> > >>> > I believe that all markup, including the ">" is escaped, >>> correct? So the result should be: >>> > >>> > <description> >>> > <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> >>> > <p>This is a chunk of XHTML.</p> >>> > </div> >>> > </description> >>> > >>> > Correct? >>> > >>> > /Roger >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >
Received on Friday, 19 June 2009 19:19:56 UTC