Re: Standard step library not in sync with the spec

yes, weird.....

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 9:26 AM, <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> wrote:
> It looks almost as if the library has been downgraded to some really old
> version. Declarations of many steps seem to be old (p:split-sequence,
> p:exec, ...), also the options of many steps do not have defaults any
> more (p:load/dtd-validate, ...).
>
> Regards,
> Vojtech
>
>

Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 07:32:56 UTC