- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:29:44 -0400
- To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 11:30:26 UTC
"Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> writes:
>> Because it's fairly general purpose and extensible ....
>
> How is XProc extensible?
You can define your own steps (in terms of other XProc steps) and use
them just like every other atomic step. Implementations can provide a
mechanism to define new atomic steps entirely independent of existing
steps. Implementors can provide a mechanism to define new functions.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | We learn from experience that not
http://nwalsh.com/ | everything which is incredible is
| untrue.--Cardinal De Retz
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 11:30:26 UTC