Re: Where's the parallelize step?

I did bring this up via public mailing list of the idea of an
attribute to provide as a hint to parallelize but I think it wasnt
really considered.

will trawl through archives.

cheers, Jim Fuller

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Why doesn't XProc have a parallelize step? That is, a step that enables two subpipelines to proceed in parallel. Is there any discussion of adding a parallelize step to XProc?
>
> >From what I've read about workflow, parallelize seems to be a basic feature of workflow languages (along with iteration, choice, and sequencing ... all of which XProc has).
>
> /Roger
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 11:32:53 UTC