- From: Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:30:07 -0400
- To: "'xproc-dev@w3.org'" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Hi Folks, Why doesn't XProc have a parallelize step? That is, a step that enables two subpipelines to proceed in parallel. Is there any discussion of adding a parallelize step to XProc? >From what I've read about workflow, parallelize seems to be a basic feature of workflow languages (along with iteration, choice, and sequencing ... all of which XProc has). /Roger
Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 11:30:44 UTC