- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:13:04 -0400
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: James Garriss <james@garriss.org>, XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 22 September 2008 20:13:50 UTC
Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> writes: > On 22 Sep 2008, at 17:33, Norman Walsh wrote: >> I believe you need SaxonSA to support the validate step. > > Couldn't you use Xerces for XSD validation? Having SaxonSA (for which > people have to pay) as a requirement is a bit of a pain when there are > free validators around. Yes, I can. And I probably will. Eventually. Right now, my implementation focus is on getting a feature complete, completely conformant implementation. If anyone gets there first, you're more than welcome to grab the sources and build the adapter :-) (What I really, really need is a Saxon Tree to SAX Source adapter: http://markmail.org/message/yrhmhucv4hpnnliy Nudge, nudge. Hint, hint. ) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Science is like sex: sometimes http://nwalsh.com/ | something useful comes out, but that is | not the reason we are doing | it.--Richard Feynman
Received on Monday, 22 September 2008 20:13:50 UTC