Re: Configuration options

"Florent Georges" <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes:

> 2008/11/13 mozer wrote:
>
>> Instead of non-namespace may I proposed to use
>> "http://www.exproc.org/ns/config" which seem neutral to me at least
>
>   I didn't check the proposed schema very carefully, but I guess some
> config options would be Calabash-specific.  I can imagine that some of
> the configuration could be defined at an implementation-independent
> level, and maybe EXProc would be great for that (and I do think that
> would be great,) but not for all the possible config options of a
> processor.

Yes. I interpreted Mohamed's comment as being that instead of using no
namespace for the general ones, we should use a namespace from
exproc.org.

That would work too.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | To create a little flower is the labour
http://nwalsh.com/            | of ages.-- Blake