- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:33:25 +0100
- To: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, "XProc Dev" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
2008/11/13 mozer wrote: > Instead of non-namespace may I proposed to use > "http://www.exproc.org/ns/config" which seem neutral to me at least I didn't check the proposed schema very carefully, but I guess some config options would be Calabash-specific. I can imagine that some of the configuration could be defined at an implementation-independent level, and maybe EXProc would be great for that (and I do think that would be great,) but not for all the possible config options of a processor. Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 19:34:08 UTC