Re: Configuration options

2008/11/13 mozer wrote:

> Instead of non-namespace may I proposed to use
> "" which seem neutral to me at least

  I didn't check the proposed schema very carefully, but I guess some
config options would be Calabash-specific.  I can imagine that some of
the configuration could be defined at an implementation-independent
level, and maybe EXProc would be great for that (and I do think that
would be great,) but not for all the possible config options of a


Florent Georges

Received on Thursday, 13 November 2008 19:34:08 UTC