[closed] Re: declaring an atomic step

"James Sulak" <jsulak@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks, Norm, that makes sense.  I'm finding that the difference
> between atomic steps and compound steps is one of the more confusing
> bits of the spec.

Hmm. I'm open to suggestions for spec improvement.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | No man is more than another if he does
http://nwalsh.com/            | no more than another.-- Cervantes