- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:23:58 +0000
- To: xproc-dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
2008/12/7 James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>:
> checkout
>
> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html#ex1
>
> is a good example of p:output getting bound .... the logic especially
> starts making sense in multi branch xproc.
<p:output port="result">
<p:pipe step="validated" port="result"/>
</p:output>
That makes sense (to some extent)
For the overall pipleline, take the output from the result port of the
validated step.
No problem.
So, If I understand this...
p:input wrapper
p:document tells it where to take input from
p:output wrapper
p:document tells it where to get output from
Which written like that seems daft IMHO.
p:output wrapper
p:document tells it where to put output
is a more logical user view IMHO.
In summary, for an atomic step
I can't say, within the pipeline, where to
get input from, and where to put output to?
I have to use defaults+the implementation params?
Is that roughly right Jim?
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Sunday, 7 December 2008 15:24:34 UTC